Why Does Anybody Need an “Assault Weapon”?

Posted: January 18, 2013 by ShortTimer in Government, Guns, Philosophy, Second Amendment

From Reason:

At this point, many self-defense activists respond that the need for guns has to do with the ability to defend against tyrannical government. Then gun controllers chirp, “but you can’t defeat tanks and nuclear weapons with rifles!” thereby demonstrating that they don’t keep up with the war in Afghanistan and skipped their history lessons about some difficulties the U.S. military ran into in a place called Vietnam.

But really, that’s all irrelevant. Because in free societies, you don’t have to justify owning things. You get to own them because you want them and have the means to acquire them. And you get to acquire more than just the basic necessities, if you so choose.

As I look around my office, I see a lot of stuff I don’t need. There are two dogs aggressively shedding on the upholstery, a hat collection (panamas and vintage fedoras), CDs and DVDs, a shit-load of books …If I owned only what I need, I’d be living in a spartan efficiency apartment, wearing a Mao suit and eating gruel. I have no interest in living that way.

The appropriate answer to “Who the hell needs … ?” is “hey, if you don’t want one, don’t buy it.” The right to own stuff without an explanation is the right to be free.

I disagree slightly, in that in order to maintain freedom, you need a modern rifle – it’s your homeland security rifle.  Of course, you probably only need one, and as long as enough people maintain and fulfill that need, it acts as a deterrent to tyranny, and it never has to be used, as its mere presence is sufficient.  Everyone benefits.

Alternately, Colion Noir explained it as well:

Self defense is a need, and self defense is a human right.

Comments
  1. Justin Turney says:

    It is not for me to explain why i need one. It is for them to justify their infringement of my right to own one.

    Please keep up the good work! Reading everything you post and i know my friends are reading too

    Sent from my iPhone

  2. Good point. I liked the way WORM put it too, which is: the discussion of need is entirely irrelevant anyway: http://wormme.com/2013/01/12/on-rights-and-needs/

    Lin

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s