Via Drudge, from Breitbart:
NBC News “spiked” the story this week, prior to Hicks’ dramatic testimony before Congress.
Toensing appeared on WMAL-FM in Washington DC Saturday with host Steve Malzberg.
“He voted for Hillary in the primary and Obama twice. NBC spiked the story where I told it before the hearings…
…It’s just amazing what the press is still trying to do to cover this up. So they try to make this partisan because of the lawyer. Well I’m not the messenger, he’s the messenger! The modus operandi is to find anything they can do to just attack.”
Thing is, if Hicks were reported as a Democrat supporter who votes Democrat all the time, it goes to show that there is actual bipartisanship – that people as Americans are saying something’s wrong, that this was a criminal coverup. There are actual Democrats who recognize that what happened at Benghazi is wrong, and there are actual Democrats who are critical of the Obama administration.
That would go against the narrative that this is just a right-wing fiction, a right-wing kooky conspiracy theory that’s all about editing a document that gets edited anyway and nobody died and nothing happened and it was all a protest against a reich-wingnut who made a video on youtube to offend the arab world because he’s out to offend them so much.
It’s only natural that people take RPGs and mortars to protests, because right-wingers make people that mad, and they deserve it. So it’s the right’s fault… according to the left.
That part really is key, in case someone isn’t getting how the White House story of a spontaneous protest doesn’t fit with reality. In the leftist worldview, it’s somehow “normal” that people take fire support to protest, and a “protest” with mortar support is a perfectly acceptable explanation for an attack on a 9/11 anniversary.