I’ll start with the fallout from the Charlottesville protest, counterprotest, and violence. A couple nights ago, President Trump held a rally in Arizona where he spent around 20 minutes condemning the mass media for lying and misrepresenting him and the facts. Most of it was warranted, some was him stretching the point. (I heard various reports say it was 16 minutes of talking about the media, others that said 30. I listened to it and it seemed longer – more like 25, but the consensus seems to be about 20 focused minutes.)
This is from the NYT yesterday, condemning Trump for going after the media. The story itself isn’t much more than the usual media caterwauling we’ve come to expect in the last year, but it’s noteable for one thing buried in the middle of it that exemplifies the problem:
Its lead items on Wednesday were about attacks on journalists in Charlottesville from both white nationalists and counterprotesters aligned with the so-called antifa movement.
So-called? (Screenshot in case it disappears.) So-called? No problem identifying the white national socialists, but the international socialists barely get mentioned and get the dismissive “so-called”, insinuating that they aren’t really a problem at all.
What seemed to particularly sting on Wednesday was the way that Mr. Trump had impugned journalists’ patriotism.
“Claim bias. Fine. Claim elitism. Fine,” Mr. VandeHei of Axios wrote on Twitter. “But to say reporters erase America’s heritage, don’t love America, turn off cameras to hide truth, are to blame for racial tension, is just plain wrong.”
Anyone with a passing interest in history knows that the founders viewed an independent press as essential to democracy. Talk about heritage.
Anyone with a passing interest in history knows that we don’t have a democracy. We have a republic – if we can keep it.
Journalists aren’t patriotic. They’ve been actively trying to get the president to fail since Trump was elected, and they want the country to suffer for it. They actively believe that half the country are neo-Nazi reactionary racist hicks who are too stupid to be trusted to live and so they need to be beaten into submission, and they’ll do so with any story and any angle they can.
They just spent the last year ranting about how Russia (which Hillary did favors for in a cash for uranium deal, lest we forget how they were Democrat friends two years ago), right up until it was basically proven the story was nonsense. Even hard-left Salon.com came to the realization that the subject was being changed because the “Russia collusion” story was BS and independent analysts have come to the conclusion it had to be an inside source – namely someone like the murdered Seth Rich.
Last week the respected left-liberal magazine The Nation published an explosive article that details in great depth the findings of a new report — authored in large part by former U.S. intelligence officers — which claims to present forensic evidence that the Democratic National Committee was not hacked by the Russians in July 2016. Instead, the report alleges, the DNC suffered an insider leak, conducted in the Eastern time zone of the United States by someone with physical access to a DNC computer.
The Russia collusion story, despite being thrown on the front page of every leftist rag for the last year, turned out to be, as communist and CNN personality Van Jones called it – a “nothingburger”. Meanwhile asking about Seth Rich’s unsolved murder is decried by the media as “right wing conspiracy”… that’s been debunked by… Snopes. Y’know, two leftists, their cats, and a spam server to keep urban legends circulating to generate traffic.
At Charlottesville, the media went out of their way to ignore that there was violence on both sides, exactly as President Trump stated. We have video of it.
The white racist identitarian national socialists – and yes, that socialism part puts them on the left, whether they like it or not – had a permit to march. They were legally entitled to go make fools of themselves, but then Antifa decided to attack them, as Antifa does.
Antifa has the wonderful self-made justification that any violence they do, especially attacks they make, are completely righteous and absolutely correct, because they call themselves “Anti-Fascist”, and everyone knows fascists are bad, so ergo they can attack anyone they view as a fascist. And anyone who opposes them must be a fascist, because they exist as a force solely to oppose fascism. It’s a wonderful circular logic that completely ignores their roots as communist rioters that go back nearly a hundred years.
One thing both sides commented on was the lack of police presence. Like we’ve seen in Berkeley over and over and over in the last year or so, the police are ordered to stand down by appointed police chiefs on leftist mayors’ orders. In the case of Charlottesville, VA, the mayor is a leftist Democrat and pal of Obama and Podesta who works with the hard leftist Center for American Progress. He’s horribly left. His vice mayor, also a Democrat, is more entertainingly terrible, in that he’s a sexist racist homophobe.
These are the kind of people who tell the police to stand down because they identify with Antifa.
CNN did an accidentally honest piece on Antifa that they had to go back and edit. This is the unedited version, still around on the Wayback Machine:
And this is the edited version, to delete the whole “they start violence everywhere they go” part:
The video story actually shows that the reporter doesn’t unmask Antifa at all. In fact, the Antifa terrorists (because they use violence for political ends and are thus the very definition of terrorists) keep their masks, hoods, and glasses on while talking about how they have to be able to commit crimes with impunity in the name of “social justice”.
Or, y’know, so they can stab people for having the wrong haircut.
A “confused anti-fascist” swung a knife towards the face of a man with a haircut similar to the one popular with white nationalists.
Joshua Witt, 26, was getting out of his car at Steak ’n Shake in Sheridan, Colorado when a man ran over to him yelling, “Are you one of them neo-Nazis?”
The man aimed for his head over his car door, but Witt blocked the blow with his hand, which needed three stitches.
“I threw my hands up and once the knife kind of hit, I dived back into my car and shut the door and watched him run off west, behind my car.”
Witt, who is in no way a neo-Nazi, joked that he believes it was indeed his haircut that confused the anti-fascist, and said he’s considering changing his style. He has no other marks that would make his attacker mistake him for a white nationalist, he said.
But it’s not really a surprise that a bunch of violent socialist revolutionaries would begin attacking people who look like their racial and political enemies.
For those who haven’t seen what Antifa actually stands for (hint: mostly communist Anti-American violence and racism against anyone who’s not in lockstep with them), here’s some examples of their propaganda and events:
Did I mention Antifa was racist?
Antifa really seems to like hitting black people who disagree with them. Seeing as how Antifa are collectivist identitarian racists, that makes sense, because someone who disagrees with them and is of a different skin-color is the kind of person who is a visual affront to their violence and stupidity just by existing.
Basically, Antifa is this: